eeeTurinI'm not sure how assault weapons are any more dangerous than normal guns. The assault weapons ban was used to stymie gun control advocates who aren't properly educated on firearms. A hunting shotgun is just as deadly as an AKM in a crowded space.banning automatic weapons or military grade weapons basically only hurts small groups of rich hobbyists, the people least likely to use a gun like an idiot. Banning handguns would produce a much stronger effect on crime but way more people own handguns and attach utility to them, leading to way more public and lobbyist backlash. Gun laws in most countries are almost 100% backwards and ineffective because the people who are against guns tend to argue from hypothetical and moral stances rather than pragmatics imo
A weapons bill that reduced restrictions on higher end weapons and didn't touch hunting rifles but severely limited who can own a handgun would be super great. A lot of states have taken the first step with limiting permits or CCWs to a higher age for handgun owners.
Do you mean limit in a sense of "only x amount of permits can be given out In one year" or "x requirements must be met to require a gun"
The only "requirement" I'm against for getting a CCW is needing a "reason" for owning a gun. I always found that a bit too stringent.